Big Waste of Time

Trump supporters in the public eye owe the rest of us accountability, and “I’m an American” isn’t an answer.

There’s a move I keep seeing from people in the public eye who spent years backing Donald Trump. The conversation turns to what he has actually done, and the answer comes back with a shrug: I’m an American. I don’t have to answer for what he’s done.

It sounds like patriotism. It’s actually the grown-up version of “I didn’t touch it, it was already broken.” And the tape shows exactly why it doesn’t hold up.

The Short Version

• Endorsing is public. Lending your name to a candidate is an act of influence, and influence comes with responsibility.
• The promises are on tape. Energy prices, Ukraine, health care, grocery bills, and “no new wars.” The quotes are below, with the video.
• The exit ramp is easy. “I was sold something that wasn’t what it claimed to be, and I believed it” is a complete sentence.
• Don’t expect it. Tribal loyalty makes silence cheaper than honesty, which is exactly why the standard matters.

The Shrug Isn’t Neutral

When a well-known person endorses a candidate, they aren’t just casting a vote. A vote is private. An endorsement is a public use of influence. It says: I’ve looked at this, I’m putting my name behind it, and you can trust my judgment.

Here is why that matters:

• Credibility is currency. Campaigns want endorsements, rally appearances, and testimonials precisely because trusted voices move people. Spending that credibility is a choice with consequences.
• People followed the lead. Plenty of Americans made their decision partly on the word of someone they respected. That trust creates an obligation.
• You can’t keep the benefit and disown the result. Lending your name when it’s convenient and going quiet when it isn’t is not neutrality. It’s a way of avoiding the bill.

What We Were Sold: The Receipts

None of these promises were vague, and none were one-offs. They were repeated on camera at rallies, in debates, and in interviews. Here are five of the biggest, with the video so you can judge for yourself, and where things stand today. Grab a snack. It’s a long receipt.

Facts and figures are current as of September 19, 2026.

1. “Cut your energy prices in half within 12 months”

The promise:

• In fall 2024, Trump said: “I will cut your energy prices in half within 12 months.” (as quoted by FactCheck.org)
• At a September 2024 rally in Wilmington, North Carolina, he reportedly added: “Mark it down, and you can get very angry at me if we don’t do it.” (as compiled by Popular Info)

Watch the tape:

Two minutes of Donald Trump on the 2024 campaign trail pledging to lower energy and electric bills by 50% within 12 months of taking office.

Also: Fox News video: Trump pledges to slash energy and electricity prices by one-half within 12 months

Where things stand:

• At the one-year mark, NPR reported that across most states and markets, prices had gone up. Wholesale power prices were up more than 60% in New York and New England and about 45% in the mid-Atlantic, and nearly 1 in 3 households were struggling to pay their utility bills.
• In the latest Bureau of Labor Statistics report (August 2026), electricity was up 3.8% over 12 months, the overall energy index was up 16.3%, and gasoline was up 27.4%.
• In fairness, NPR found gasoline at the pump fell about 10% in that first year. That is real, and it is nowhere near half.
• This wasn’t a surprise to the experts. Economists told FactCheck.org the goal was “quite unlikely,” and one said it couldn’t be done “unless the global economy craters.” The promise was made anyway.

Mark it down, he said. We did. The electric bill didn’t get the memo.

2. “That war settled in one day, 24 hours”

The promise:

• May 10, 2023, CNN town hall: “If I’m president, I will have that war settled in one day, 24 hours.”
• June 27, 2024, presidential debate and again on the trail that fall: he pledged to settle the war between Putin and Zelensky as president-elect, before he even took office on January 20. (as summarized by CNN)
• CNN’s fact-check counted at least 53 times he made a version of this pledge between March 2023 and October 2024. That is a slogan, not an ad-lib.

Then came the walk-back:

• March 2025: he said he was being “a little bit sarcastic”.
• April 2025, in a Time interview: “Obviously, people know that when I said that, it was said in jest, but it was also said that it will be ended.” (PolitiFact)

Fifty-three times is a lot of sarcasm for one promise.

Watch the tape:

A montage of clips of Trump guaranteeing he will end the war in Ukraine within 24 hours of taking office.

Also: CNN’s compilation of 53 times Trump made the pledge

Where things stand:

• The war continues. As of early September 2026, U.S. envoys had just visited Moscow and Kyiv to try to restart talks, and Al Jazeera reported that no immediate breakthrough was foreseen while Russia intensified strikes on Ukrainian infrastructure.
• Diplomacy is ongoing, and that’s worth acknowledging. But “24 hours” became “in jest,” and the war is still going.

3. Health care: “concepts of a plan”

The promise, over and over:

• 2015: he would repeal Obamacare and “replace with something terrific.” (Axios timeline)
• 2020: “We’re signing a health care plan within two weeks, a full and complete health care plan.”
• September 10, 2024, debate, asked directly whether he had a replacement for the Affordable Care Act: “I have concepts of a plan. I’m not president right now.”

Read in order, the plan goes from “terrific” to “two weeks” to “concepts.” That isn’t a timeline. It’s a downgrade path.

Watch the tape:

Trump says he has “concepts of a plan” for health care (ABC Presidential Debate).

Also: C-SPAN clip: Donald Trump on Healthcare Plan: Has “Concepts of a Plan”

Where things stand:

• No comprehensive replacement plan has ever been released, according to Axios.
• The enhanced ACA tax credits expired on January 1, 2026. PBS News reported an average premium cost increase of 114% for more than 20 million subsidized enrollees, and projections that roughly 4.8 million people would drop coverage.
• In fairness, those credits were a temporary pandemic-era measure and their expiration was the result of a long fight in Congress. But a candidate who promised “something better” and never produced a plan doesn’t get to be surprised by that outcome.

4. “Prices down, starting on Day One”

The promise:

• August 2024: “When I win, I will immediately bring prices down, starting on Day One.” (as cited in Sen. Cory Booker’s video release)

Where things stand:

• Per the latest BLS report, food at home is up 2.2% over the past 12 months and energy is up 16.3%. Prices didn’t come down. They kept going up.

“Day One,” it turns out, is a very flexible unit of time. So is “24 hours.” So is “12 months.”

5. “No new wars,” and an Iranian military he says is “decimated”

The promise:

• Throughout the 2024 campaign, Trump cast his opponents as warmongers and said he was a president who started “no new wars”, according to NPR.
• The war with Iran began on February 28, 2026, with U.S. and Israeli strikes in what the administration called Operation Epic Fury. (ABC News timeline)

Watch the tape:

Trump saying “I didn’t guarantee no war,” alongside clips of him guaranteeing no more wars.

Then came the walk-back:

• June 2026, on NBC’s Meet the Press: “I didn’t guarantee no war. Why would I have built the strongest military in the world?” He also said: “I didn’t promise anything.” (NPR)
• CNN’s fact-check of that interview was headlined that he never promised not to start a new war, and that in fact he did, repeatedly.

The victory claims:

• March 14, 2026, on Truth Social: “We have already destroyed 100% of Iran’s military capability.” (PolitiFact)
• March 16, at the Kennedy Center, Iran’s military was “literally obliterated. The air force is gone. The navy is gone.” The same day in the Oval Office: “In two weeks we have decimated them.” (PolitiFact)
• April 7: “Total and complete victory. 100%.” (PBS News)
• Months later, he was still calling Iran’s navy “decimated” and claiming 159 Iranian vessels had been sunk. (Fox News live updates, Sept. 16)

Word nerds will note that “decimate” originally meant to destroy one in ten. “Obliterated” and “100%” mean something quite different, and it’s hard to be all of them at once.

Watch the tape:

Trump says the U.S. has decimated Iran’s military and destroyed 60 mine boats.

Also: Fox clip: “Trump: We’ve obliterated Iran’s navy, air force and anti-aircraft equipment”

Where things stand:

• PolitiFact found that Iran kept firing drones and missiles at regional targets and U.S. forces after the “100%” claim, concluding it was “seriously hurt” but “hardly defeated.” Fox News reported that even after the big ships were hit, over 60% of Iran’s fast attack fleet was still intact, along with mines, drones, and coastal anti-ship missiles.
• NPR reported that a CIA report indicated Iran had preserved about 70% of its pre-conflict weapons reserves, and that satellite imagery reviewed by CNN showed most of its underground missile production had been restored.
• The April 7 ceasefire did not hold the strait open. Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz again the next day, and the U.S. began a naval blockade of Iranian ports on April 13. As of mid-September, the blockade was still in force.
• PBS’s April fact-check counted 13 U.S. service members killed. Gasoline averaged $2.98 a gallon before the war, $4.09 on August 28, and peaked at $4.56 in May, per AAA figures cited by the Washington Examiner.
• On September 16, the House voted 220-204, with seven Republicans joining Democrats, to restrict presidential war authority.
• In fairness, PBS confirmed the U.S. and Israel scored significant battlefield wins, and the administration argues a premature exit would trigger a “worldwide energy crisis” (Vice President Vance). The dispute isn’t whether Iran was hurt. It’s whether “100% destroyed” and “total victory” match what came next.

The clips above are Trump in his own words. Watch them and decide whether what you were sold matches what you got.

A Bad Sale of Goods

Think of it as a purchase. You buy something because of what the seller promised: it’s going to fix the problem, it will last, it will be exactly what the label says. Then it arrives and it isn’t that.

A reasonable person doesn’t defend the product out of pride. They say: this isn’t what I was sold. Being taken in by a skilled salesman isn’t shameful. Plenty of careful, smart, good people have been.

Now imagine you’re the well-known face in the infomercial. You held up the product, smiled at the camera, and told everyone it changed your life. When the thing falls apart, you don’t get to say, “Hey, I’m just a customer.” The shameful part isn’t being fooled. It’s insisting the product matches the promise, or insisting you had nothing to do with the sale.

What Accountability Looks Like for Trump Supporters

I’m not asking for groveling. I’m offering the most generous accounting available. The alternative to “I was duped” is “I knew, and I backed it anyway,” and that’s a much harder sentence to say.

Accountability has four parts, and none of them involve a hair shirt:

1. Say what you backed. Be specific about what you told people to expect.
2. Say where it fell short. Name what didn’t match the promise, without hedging it into mush.
3. Say it plainly. No “mistakes were made,” no “both sides,” no changing the subject.
4. Act differently. Let the admission change what you say and do next.

Why “I’m an American” Is the Reason to Answer

The line gets it backwards. In a republic, being an American is exactly why you owe your fellow citizens an account. Citizenship isn’t a hall pass. It’s a share in a common project, and everyone who holds one answers to everyone else for how it’s run.

Those with the biggest platforms carry a bigger share of that duty, because more people took their cues from them. Patriotism is supposed to mean ownership: this is our country, so we answer for what happens in it.

The Objections

I want to take the strongest pushback seriously.

• “I never agreed with everything he did.” Nobody does, and I’m not asking for a full repudiation. But partial disagreement calls for precision. Say which parts. “I’m an American” tells us nothing.
• “I backed the policies, not the man.” For some people that’s true and reasonable. Then be able to say where the man broke the deal you thought you were making.
• “Why do I owe you anything?” Because people followed your lead. You held a microphone, and others made decisions partly on your word.
• “Isn’t this a purity test?” No. A purity test has no exit, and this one does. There’s no rubric and no pop quiz. Say you were misled, say what you’d do differently, and you’re welcome back into the conversation.
• “People change their minds.” Yes, and that’s the best outcome. Changing your mind in public gives everyone else permission to do the same. What I can’t respect is a shrug pretending there was nothing to change.
• “Some of it is working.” Some of it may be, and honest accounting includes saying so. Gas prices fell for a stretch, diplomacy on Ukraine continues. But “some of it” is not “the package that was sold,” and the difference is the whole point.

The Hard Part: We Probably Won’t Get It

Here’s the part I’d be dodging if I skipped it: most of the people I’m describing are not going to say any of this. Not this year, and maybe not ever.

The reason isn’t that the case is weak. For a lot of supporters, the question was never “did he keep his promises?” It was “which side am I on?” Political scientists have argued for years that partisanship works less like a checklist of policy preferences and more like a team identity. Once it’s an identity, a bad result isn’t evidence against the candidate. It’s an attack on us.

What that looks like in practice:

• Loyalty beats values. Someone who once cared about deficits, standing up to Russia, or a president telling the truth can watch the opposite happen and stay quiet, because speaking up feels like handing the other team a point.
• Silence is cheaper than honesty. Say “I was wrong” and you risk your audience, your friends, and your standing. Say nothing and the shrug is free. “I’m an American” is the budget option.
• The other side becomes the excuse. Every criticism gets answered with a counter-accusation. Whataboutism isn’t a defense. It’s a change of subject with better posture.
• Sunk cost. The longer and louder someone backed him, the more a reversal feels like an indictment of their own judgment. Nobody wants to be the first one to leave the party, especially when the group chat is that active.

In fairness, this isn’t a one-party disease. Tribal loyalty is a human default, and every side has people who would sooner defend a bad call than concede one. I’d say the same to anyone who backed a candidate on the other side and couldn’t name where that candidate fell short. The standard doesn’t change with the jersey. What makes this case worth writing about is how much is on the record: the promises are on tape, the results are measurable, and the shrug still comes.

So no, I don’t expect a wave of public apologies. But “they probably won’t” is a prediction, not an excuse. It’s the reason the standard matters. Accountability that only happens when it’s easy isn’t accountability. The people who do it anyway, who break ranks, name the gap between the promise and the result, and take the heat from their own side, are doing about the most patriotic thing available to them. They also prove it’s survivable.

And if you’re a supporter reading this and bristling: the door is open, and it doesn’t lock behind you.

Why It Matters

Accountability is what makes trust possible. If public figures can back something enormous, watch it go sideways, and simply decline to speak about it, endorsements mean nothing and vouching for people has no cost. That teaches a corrosive lesson to everyone watching, and it makes us all easier to fool next time.

Being fooled once is forgivable. What matters is what you do when you find out. You can pretend it didn’t happen, or you can look the rest of us in the eye and say: I was sold something that wasn’t what it claimed to be, I believed it, and I was wrong.

To the public figures who backed him: you don’t have to answer to me personally, but you do owe an answer to the country you say you love. “I’m an American” doesn’t excuse you from that. It’s the reason you owe it.

Accountability matters. The people who model it earn back more trust than they lose.

More From Big Waste of Time

• Zero Crossings, Zero Credibility: the “secure border” claim versus DHS’s own data.
• The Week That Was: Shoes, Slogans, and Skeletor: Iran’s very-gone-but-still-attacking military, and more.
• Friday Roundup: Cubs Crush, Padres Get Pantsed, and a Chart That Tells a Whopper: a look at a misleading oil price chart.

Sources

• NPR: Trump promised to cut energy bills in half. One year later, has he delivered?
• BLS Consumer Price Index, August 2026
• FactCheck.org: Trump’s proposal to cut energy prices in half
• Popular Info: Trump repeatedly pledged to cut gas prices by 50%
• CNN: 53 times Trump said he’d end the Ukraine war within 24 hours or before taking office
• PolitiFact: End the Russia-Ukraine war within 24 hours
• The Hill: Trump says he was “being a little bit sarcastic” about the 24-hour promise
• Al Jazeera: Will Trump succeed in restarting Russia-Ukraine peace talks?
• Axios: Trump’s undelivered health care plan
• PBS News: Health subsidies expire, launching millions of Americans into 2026 with steep insurance hikes
• C-SPAN: Donald Trump on Healthcare Plan: Has “Concepts of a Plan”
• Sen. Cory Booker: Trump’s vow to lower prices “on Day One”
• NPR: Trump says Iran doesn’t go against his campaign pledge of no new wars
• CNN: Trump told NBC that he never promised not to start a new war. He did, repeatedly
• PolitiFact: Has the US “destroyed 100% of Iran’s military capability”?
• PBS News: Fact-checking Trump and Hegseth’s claims of U.S. “victory” in the Iran war
• NPR: Trump says Iran’s military is “totally destroyed.” Here’s where their stockpiles stand
• Fox News: Trump says Iran’s navy “obliterated” as US enforces Hormuz blockade
• Fox News live updates, September 16, 2026
• ABC News: 4 phases of the Iran war
• Washington Examiner: Gas prices remain above $4 six months into Iran war